A gaping chasm of cognitive dissonance that literally destroyed any chances of a Wisconsin is for plvoers shirt .It seems like the fact that pretty much anyone who has lived in a communist country but isn’t actually living in a communist country being staunchly opposed to communism would show wannabe commies – who have never even lived in a communist country – that it’s not all it’s cracked up to be… but like always, Tankies gonna Tank no matter the evidence.Read the title and knew they would launch straight into blaming the United States. Not even a mention of Cuba’s repressive dictatorial regime, nope just blame the US for everything. The amount of leftists in denial over Cuba is disheartening. Its like this fairy tail image they had in their heads is being unraveled and they are desperately clinging to any way they can blame it all on capitalism.Apparently the failures of Communist Cuba are solely because they need more access to capitalist markets. I doubt very many leftists are realizing the Irony in that thought process.Them saying that Cubans have expressed solidarity with people of African descent is very ignorant. Up to 62% of Cubans have black ancestry and 36% are black or half-black. They’re assuming Cubans are all white based on Cuban Americans, who are mostly white. It’s very ignorant of how Cuba actually is.
Wisconsin is for plvoers shirt, Hoodie, Sweater, Ladie Tee, Vneck, Bellaflowy, Kids Shirt, Unisex and Tank Top, T-shirt
Best Wisconsin is for plvoers shirt
They said people of African-descent like Assata Shakur, an American. This implies that Cubans are not of African descent. You can’t show solidarity with a people you’re apart of. MLK wouldn’t say he shows solidarity with black people. It wouldn’t make sense. Their statement implies that Cubans are not of African descent and that’s the problem. Their view of what Wisconsin is for plvoers shirt is is warped.Very much so. But I wonder if people here do actually support the embargo? It seems to me to be a relic of the Cold War which is counterproductive for both sides. Look at what happened in Vietnam after normalisation of relations – free(ish) trade can spread freedom. Then obviously there’s the hypocrisy of US support for other worse regimes, but you can bring that up in any argument reallyI think that the bigger problem is that BLM is saying Cuba’s problems are all related to the embargo, and is completely ignoring the elephant in the room that is the leftwing authoritarian government there.As far as lifting the embargo he’s, I think it would be a good policy, but I don’t think the timing is great to do it right now. It would make it seem like the US is supporting the government right as the people are rising up against it.At this point, I feel it’s too late. For all the senseless hysteria on the right about it, they had one point. Even if someone is not racist and disavows white nationalists, they can still reject the BLM slogan because it often implies a lot of policy positions that have nothing to do with fighting racism.