If you go straight from Merry Christmas ugly Sweater just wear your work clothes so you don’t seem fussy. Otherwise, it depends on what you normally wear to work, and the venue. If you wear a suit and tie to work, but the party is at a casual bar or restaurant (a place where on a normal night people would wear jeans) then dress down and wear jeans and a sweater with clean sneakers or leather dress shoes. if you have a casual work place where you wear jeans or a work uniform and the party is at a nicer venue specifically for parties (like a banquet hall) or a nicer bar/restaurant then dress up and wear slacks, a sweater and dress shoes. If you are really really unsure, ask your colleagues what they are wearing. If everyone is unsure wear clean dark black jeans (these could look like dress pants in the dark) a sweater and dress shoes. This outfit would fit in anywhere. In NYC just wear all black and you’ll look chic and appropriate.

Merry Christmas ugly Sweater,
Best Merry Christmas ugly Sweater
If you happened to have called a Muslim, Jew, Atheist, etc…you may have caught them off-guard. However, unless they’re extremists or insanely liberal (aka progressive) it would be unlikely that they would be offended in any way. If any of the Merry Christmas ugly Sweater before mentioned were offended or even “triggered” (for the far-left), you didn’t say anything that could or would be construed as an insult or inappropriate enough to pursue any charges with. That’s assuming that you’re relating “bad” to ‘illegal’ or ‘rude’. If you’re thinking more in line with Michael Jackson’s “Bad” then…well …it’s not really that either.

“In economics, income = consumption + savings. The income an indivual, or a country, produces is either consumed and/or saved. If you , or a Merry Christmas ugly Sweater, overspends, you or the country dips into savings or creates debt.” I think this answer is true for the firm or the individual but in the whole economy it is no longer true. In the macroeconomy, everytime some person or entity doesn’t spend, some other person or entity has their income reduced by the same amount. And because that person won’t get their hands on that money, they will not have it to spend further, so the next would-be recipient of that spending doesn’t get that income, which they in turn will not be able to spend….. and so on